Democratic governance

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Editorial Policies
  • Submissions
  • Archives
  • Indexing
  • Contact Info
uk

Article

Cross-border innovation clusters as a tool for sustainable development of territorial communities: Management and legal aspects

Henriett Karolyi Daria Ivashchenko Volodymyr Podibka Myroslav Zhdankevych Oleksandr Khotskyi
Abstract

The relevance of the study is due to the need to find effective tools for ensuring sustainable development of territorial communities, in particular in the context of European integration and the growing role of cross-border cooperation. The aim of the article was to study the management and legal aspects of the formation and functioning of cross-border innovation clusters as a tool for stimulating regional development. The methodological basis was an interdisciplinary approach using comparative, institutional analysis and the case study method. As a result of the study, it was established that cross-border innovation clusters act as an effective mechanism for integrating economic, innovative and social resources of border territories, ensuring the formation of network interactions between business, science, and government. An analysis of European experience showed that the success is based on a combination of institutional support, a developed regulatory framework and the active participation of public administration bodies. The generalisation of practical cases made it possible to identify the key effects of cross-border projects, in particular economic, innovative, infrastructural, social and institutional. At the same time, it was established that in Ukraine the majority of cross-border cluster initiatives are of a project-based nature and are not transformed into stable institutional structures, which limits the long-term impact. It was revealed that the main restraining factors are the fragmentation of legal regulation, insufficient coordination between institutions and limited financial resources. The need to develop effective management mechanisms, harmonisation of the regulatory framework and strengthening the participation of territorial communities in international cooperation programmes is substantiated. The practical value of the study lies in the possibility of using the obtained results to improve state regional policy and form effective models of management of cross-border cluster initiatives

Keywords

regional investment policy; cross-border cooperation; Euroregions; innovation ecosystems; legal regulation

Download article

Received 19.01.2026, Revised 20.04.2026, Accepted 28.05.2026 Published 25.06.2026

Retrieved from Volume 19, No. 1, 2026

Suggested citation

Karolyi, H., Ivashchenko, D., Podibka, V., Zhdankevych, M., & Khotskyi, O. (2026). Cross-border innovation clusters as a tool for sustainable development of territorial communities: Management and legal aspects. Democratic Governance, 19(1), 33-45. https://doi.org/10.56318/dg/1.2026.33

https://doi.org/10.56318/dg/1.2026.33

Pages 33-45

References

  1. Attractive Hardwoods – best practice in tourism development, marketing and sustainable management of Attractive Hardwoods. (2025). Retrieved from https://southbaltic.eu/projects-and-success-stories/attractive-hardwoods-best-practice-in-tourism-development-marketing-and-sustainable-management-of-attractive-hardwoods/.
  2. BioBIGG (Bioeconomy Innovation for Growth in the South Baltic Area). (n.d.). Retrieved from https://biobigg.ruc.dk/.
  3. Bioeconomy Strategy. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://environment.ec.europa.eu/strategy/bioeconomy-strategy_en.
  4. BioValley Basel. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://biovalley.ch/.
  5. Borges, J.A.R., Neuberger, S., Saatkamp, H., Oude Lansink, A., & Darr, D. (2021). Stakeholder viewpoints on facilitation of cross-border cooperation. European Planning Studies, 30(4), 627-642. doi. 10.1080/09654313.2021.1988061.
  6. Carpathian Euroregion. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.karpacki.pl/en/.
  7. CluStrat. (n.d.) Retrieved from https://gapr.pl/en/offer/eu-projects/completed-eu-projects/clustrat.
  8. Cooke, P. (2004). Introduction: Regional innovation systems – an evolutionary approach. In P. Cooke, M. Heidenreich & H.-J. Braczyk (Eds.), Regional innovation systems: The role of governance in a globalized world (2nd ed.; pp. 1-18). London: Routledge.
  9. D’ambrosio, A., Gabriele, R., Schiavone, F., & Villasalero, M. (2017). The role of openness in explaining innovation performance in a regional context. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42, 389-408. doi: 10.1007/s10961-016-9501-8.
  10. Danko, N., & Izmailov, O. (2025). Cluster model of cross-border cooperation between Ukraine and Poland in the context of European integration. Sustainable Development of Economy, 6(57), 361-366. doi: 10.32782/2308-1988/2025-57-47.
  11. Derudder, B., & Liu, X. (2025). Cross-border regional innovation systems: concepts, approaches and perspectives. Regional Studies, 59(1). doi: 10.1080/00343404.2024.2418704.
  12. ECCP (The European Cluster Collaboration Platform). (2025). Cross regional Bio Innovation Growth mega Cluster (BIG-Cluster). Retrieved from https://www.clustercollaboration.eu/content/cross-regional-bio-innovation-growth-mega-cluster-big-cluster.
  13. European Commission. (2016). Smart guide to cluster policy. Retrieved from https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/e1fb9f84-2ba9-11e6-b616-01aa75ed71a1.
  14. European Grouping of Territorial Cooperation (EGTC) (n.d.). Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/policy/cooperation/european-territorial/european-grouping-territorial-cooperation_en.
  15. European Outline Convention on Transfrontier Co-operation between Territorial Communities or Authorities. (1980, May). Retrieved from https://rm.coe.int/1680078b0c.
  16. Hardi, T., Kupi, M., Ocskay, G., & Szemerédi, E. (2021). Examining cross-border cultural tourism as an indicator of territorial integration across the Slovak-Hungarian border. Sustainability, 13(13), article number 7225. doi: 10.3390/su13137225.
  17. Interreg NEXT Poland-Ukraine. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://interreg.eu/programmes/next-poland-ukraine/.
  18. Interreg South Baltic Programme. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://southbaltic.eu/.
  19. ITBridge: EU-Ukraine IT cluster bridge to digital sector resilience. (2025). Retrieved from https://it-kharkiv.com/projects/itbridge-eu-ukraine-it-cluster-bridge-to-digital-sector-resilience.
  20. Ketels, C., & Protsiv, S. (2021). Cluster presence and economic performance: A new look based on European data. Regional Studies, 55(2), 208-220. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2020.1792435.
  21. Kotyhoroshko, L. (2017). Claster activation of cross-border cooperation of the Transcarpathian region. Journal “Securities Market of Ukraine”, 9-10, 49-58.
  22. Kowalski, A. (2020). Cooperation in the framework of innovative activities of cluster initiatives in Poland. Studia BAS, 61, 87-102.
  23. Kurowska-Pysz, J., Castanho, R.A., & Loures, L. (2018). Sustainable planning of cross-border cooperation: A strategy for alliances in border cities. Sustainability, 10(5), article number 1416. doi: 10.3390/su10051416.
  24. Law of Ukraine No. 156-VIII “On the Principles of State Regional Policy”. (2015, February). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/156-19#Text.
  25. Law of Ukraine No. 280/97-VR “On Local Self-Government in Ukraine”. (1997, May). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/280/97-%D0%B2%D1%80#Text.
  26. Law of Ukraine No. 3668-IX “On International Territorial Cooperation of Ukraine”. (2024, April). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/3668-20#Text.
  27. Law of Ukraine No. 40-IV “On Innovative Activity”. (2002, July). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/40-15#Text.
  28. Liashenko, V., & Trushkina, N. (2021). Institutional principles of formation of cross-border transport and logistics cluster in the conditions of digital and sustainable development. Green, Blue and Digital Economy Journal, 2(3), 90-100. doi: 10.30525/2661-5169/2021-3-14.
  29. Luhova, O.A., & Gumenyuk, D.M. (2012). Cross-border clusters as a form of activating interregional cooperation. Scientific Bulletin of the Lesya Ukrainka Volyn National University, 20(245), 47-51.
  30. Makkonen, T., & Rohde, S. (2016). Cross-border regional innovation systems: Conceptual backgrounds, empirical evidence and policy implications. European Planning Studies, 24(9), 1623-1642. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2016.1184626.
  31. OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). (2011). Regions and innovation policy. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  32. Rácz, S. (2017). Main characteristics of Hungarian-Croatian political relations and Cross-Border Co-operations. Geographica Pannonica, 21(1), 54-67. doi: 10.18421/GP21.01-05.
  33. Regulation (EU) No. 1287/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council “On Establishing a Programme for the Competitiveness of Enterprises and Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (COSME) (2014-2020) and Repealing Decision No. 1639/2006/EC”. (2013, December). Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2013/1287/oj/eng.
  34. Resolution of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine No. 1242-V “On Recommendations of parliamentary hearings on the topic: ‘On intensification of cooperation between Ukraine and the European Union within the framework of Euroregions and prospects for cross-border cooperation’”. (2007, June). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1242-16#Text.
  35. Reznikova, N., Rubtsova, M., & Yatsenko, O. (2020). The role of innovation clusters in building up investment and innovation strategies in the cross-border cooperation context. Actual Problems of International Relations, 142, 85-98. doi: 10.17721/apmv.2020.142.1.85-98.
  36. Singh, B., & Chandra, S. (2025). Fostering collaborative cross-border regions relationships with tourists, residents, and stakeholders concerning SDG 17. In Cross-border regions cooperation and implications for organizations (pp.137-162). London: IGI Global. doi: 10.4018/979-8-3373-1912-4.ch005.
  37. Stegniy, S. (2025). Cross-border cooperation between Ukraine and the EU: Socio-economic impacts and prospects. Herald of Khmelnytskyi National University. Economic Sciences, 340(2), 373-379. doi: 10.31891/2307-5740-2025-340-59.
  38. Sydorchuk, O., Kharechko, D., Khomenko, H., Akimova, L.M., Kosarevych, N., & Akimov, O. (2024). Competencies for sustainable financial and economic management: Their impact on human capital development and national security. Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, 8(6), 1445-1454. doi: 10.55214/25768484.v8i6.2261.
  39. The European Cluster Collaboration Platform (ECCP). (n.d). Retrieved from https://www.clustercollaboration.eu/.
  40. Ukrainian Cluster Alliance. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.clusters.org.ua.ac
  41. Vanguard Initiative. (n.d.) Retrieved from https://www.s3vanguardinitiative.eu.
  42. Zhao, Y., Lyu, L., & Grimes, S. (2024). An analytical framework for cross-border regional innovation ecosystems: The case of Shenzhen-Hong Kong cross-border region. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 115(3), 402-417. doi: 10.1111/tesg.12617.
e-ISSN 2070-4038
DOI: 10.56318/dg