Petrovskyy, P.
(2022).
Relevance of scientific substantiation of public administration activities in conditions of war.
Democratic Governance,
15(2),
1-13.
https://doi.org/10.23939/dg2022.02.001
The article considers the need for further democratic development of Ukrainian society in the context of a full-scale war on the part of the Russian Federation, in particular, the preservation of a democratic level of activity in the public administration sphere. The article reveals such aspects of scientific substantiation of managerial decisions as achieving empirical reliability of knowledge, determining the conceptual foundations of activity and formulating strategies for the development of the public sphere. It is established that the essential features of knowledge at these levels will be truth, rationality and significance. It is argued that in times of war, the social significance of public administration activity is of particular importance, which focuses on consolidating the efforts of the whole society to strengthen the country's defense capability, defeat the invaders and preserve sovereignty, democracy and humanism
public administration activities, scientific justification, levels of scientific justification, reliable knowledge, rational solution, social significance, imperatives of war
Received 27.07.2022, Revised 17.10.2022, Accepted 21.11.2022
Retrieved from Volume 15, No. 2, 2022
https://doi.org/10.23939/dg2022.02.001
Pages 1-13
[1] Weber, M. (1998). “Objectivity” of socio-scientific knowledge. Sociology. General historical analysis. Kyiv: Osnovy.
[2] Horbulin, V. (2017). World hybrid war. Kharkiv: Folio.
[3] Datsiuk, S. (2022). About total war. Ukrainian truth. Retrieved from https://blogs.pravda.com.ua/authors/datsuk/6329f5f30ed76/.
[4] Surmin, Yu.P., & Nadolishnyi, P.I. (Eds.) (2011). Methodology of public administration. In Yu.V. Kovbasyuk (Ed.), Encyclopedia of public administration (Vol. 2). Kyiv: Publishing House of NADU.
[5] Kuleba, D. (2022). War for reality: How to win in the world of fakes, truths and communities (3rd ed.). Kyiv: Knygolab.
[6] Knyazev, V.M., & Bakaev, Yu.V. (2007). Methodology of scientific research in the field of “Public administration”. Kyiv: Publishing House of NADU.
[7] Order of the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine No. 3959/5 “On Amendments to the Order of the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine Dated June 23, 2011 No. 1707/5”. (2022, September). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z1090-22#n4.
[8] Petrovskyi, P.M., & Krasivskyi, O.Ya. (2021). Theoretical and methodological justification of reforms in the public management sphere. Actual Problems of Public Administration, 1(59), 17-24. https://doi.org/10.34213/ap.21.01.02 .
[9] Petrovskyi, P.M. (2019). Theoretical and methodological foundations of Ukraine's victory in the modern semantic war. In V. Zahorskyi & A. Lipentseva (Eds.), Efficiency of public administration: A collection of scientific works (Vol.1(58), pp. 13-25). Lviv: LRIDU NADU.
[10] Pocheptsov, H. (2016). Meanings and wars: Ukraine and Russia in information and meaning wars. Kyiv: Publishing House “Kyiv-Mohyla Academy”.
[11] Romenets, V.A. (1995). History of psychology in the 19th and early 20th centuries. Kyiv: Higher School.
[12] Selivanov, V. (2007). The human dimension of the modern Ukrainian state and current law. Legal Bulletin, 1, 5-14.
[13] Stone, D. (2000). Paradox of politics. The art of making political decisions. Kyiv: Alternative.
[14] Strategy for reforming the state administration of Ukraine for 2022-2025. (2021, July). Retrieved from https://www.kmu.gov.ua/storage/app/sites/1/reforms/pars-2022-2025-ukr.pdf.
[15] Tsvetkov, V.V. (2007). Democracy and public administration: Theory, methodology, practice. Kyiv: Publishing House “Yuridychna dumka”.
[16] Shostrom, E. (1994). Human choice – manipulation or actualization. Anti-Carnegies. Moscow: Smysl.