Petrovskyy, P.
(2022).
The problem of defining the concept of national development of Ukraine in the post-war period.
Democratic Governance,
15(1),
1-12.
https://doi.org/10.23939/dg2022.01.001
The author examines the peculiarities of the current state of Ukraine's struggle for its sovereignty and territorial integrity against the war on the part of the Russian Federation and reveals the need to oppose the aggressor's attacks with both military power and the values and meanings of democracy, which is meaningfully reflected in the concept of national development. The author identifies the fundamental provisions of the concept, the importance of its scientific substantiation and approval by the general public, as well as its effective motivational impact on the modernization of social and governmental relations. The author emphasizes the uniqueness of the national situation, which determines the need for a creative, innovative approach, the impossibility of mechanical borrowing or duplication of other people's ideas and principles, which, in particular, applies to the well-known concept of libertarian paternalism.
semantic war, concept, doctrine, Concept of National Development of Ukraine, theoretical and methodological substantiation, libertarian paternalism
Received 06.01.2022, Revised 03.04.2022, Accepted 29.04.2022
Retrieved from Volume 15, No. 1, 2022
https://doi.org/10.23939/dg2022.01.001
Pages 1-12
[1] Concept of humanitarian development of Ukraine: Draft. (2008). Kyiv: SE State Administration Printing House.
[2] Draft Concept of humanitarian development of Ukraine for the period until 2020. (2011). Retrieved from https://dniokh.gov.ua/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/koncepciya_hum_rozvytku.pdf.
[3] Resolution of Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine No. 167 “On the Approval of the Concept of Development of Digital Competences and the Approval of the Plan of Measures for its Implementation”. (2021, March). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/167-2021-%D1%80.
[4] Gorbulin, V.P. (2017). Chronicle of predictions: 2006-2017. Kharkiv: Folio.
[5] Popovych, M.V. (2018). Philosophy of freedom = Philosophy of freedom. Kharkiv: Folio.
[6] Galchynskyi, A. (2011). Liberalism: Lessons for Ukraine. Kyiv: Lybid.
[7] Petrovskyi, P.M. (2008). The concept of humanitarian development of Ukraine: Theoretical and methodological aspects of understanding. Collection of Scientific Papers of the National Academy of Sciences, 2, 50-55.
[8] Pocheptsov, H. (2016). Meanings and wars: Ukraine and Russia in information and meaning wars. Kyiv: Publishing house “Kyiv-Mohyla Academy”.
[9] Baudrir, J. (2004). Simulacra and simulations. Kyiv: Solomia Pavlychko Publishing House “Osnovy”.
[10] Gerasimov, V. (2013). The value of science in prediction. New challenges require a rethinking of the forms and methods of conducting hostilities. Retrieved from https://vpk.name/news/85159_cennost_nauki_v_predvidenii.html.
[11] Karaganov, S. (2016). Russia will be the heart of greater Eurasia. Retrieved from https://albert-lex.livejournal.com/147957.html .
[12] Taler, R. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth and happiness. Yale: Yale University Press.
[13] Bezrukov, S. (2020). Socio-philosophical approaches to understanding the phenomenon of “libertarian paternalism”. Philosophical Horizons, 44.
[14] Lyakh, N.A. (2002). Paternalism in Russia. Retrieved from https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/paternalizm-v-rossii.
[15] Bowes, D. (2004). Libertarianism: History, principles, politics. Chelyabinsk: Society, Cato Institute.