Pfister, D.
(2025).
The essence and classification of methods of public administration in the context of the development of the Smart City concept.
Democratic Governance,
18(2),
56-64.
https://doi.org/10.56318/dg/2.2025.56
Under conditions of the digital transformation of public authority, the strengthening of the role of urban territories in ensuring sustainable development and the growing societal demand for transparency, accountability and citizen participation, the rethinking of methods of public administration through the prism of the development of the Smart City concept becomes particularly relevant. The aim of the study was the conceptual substantiation and systematisation of approaches to understanding methods of public administration under conditions of the digitalisation of management processes and the introduction of smart-oriented models of urban development. The article provided a theoretical and methodological analysis of the essence of methods of public administration in the context of the transformation of the public governance system under the influence of digitalisation and the development of the Smart City concept. The evolution of academic approaches to interpreting methods of public administration is revealed – from the classical rational-legal model to contemporary concepts of good governance, results-oriented management and digital governance. It is substantiated that, in the Smart City environment, methods of public administration acquire an integrative character, combining legal regulators, administrative and organisational procedures, economic incentives and communicative instruments with digital platforms, data analytics, electronic services and mechanisms of citizen participation. It is shown that traditional classifications of methods, formed within the hierarchical model of governance, do not fully correspond to the challenges of network interaction, interoperability, digital by default and the growing role of data-driven governance. A generalised classification of methods of public administration is proposed in the context of the development of the Smart City, which takes into account organisational, economic, digital and social aspects of governance and reflects the functional purpose in the “goals – functions – methods – instruments – results” system of sustainable development of urban territories. The practical value of the study lies in the possibility of using the proposed classification of methods of public administration in the activities of local self-government bodies to increase the effectiveness of management decisions and to adapt European Smart City approaches to national conditions
digitalisation of public authority; data-driven governance; electronic services; citizen participation; sustainable development of territories; public governance
Received 15.07.2025, Revised 02.10.2025, Accepted 10.12.2025
Retrieved from Volume 18, No. 2, 2025
https://doi.org/10.56318/dg/2.2025.56
Pages 56-64
[1] Bobrovska, O. (2020). Managerial approaches to the implementation of digital technologies in public administration. Aspects of Public Administration, 8(1 SI), 12-14. doi: 10.15421/152029.
[2] Brzeziński, Ł., & Wyrwicka, M.K. (2022). Fundamental directions of the development of the smart cities concept and solutions in Poland. Energies, 15(21), article number 8213. doi: 10.3390/en15218213.
[3] Chourabi, H., Nam, T., Walker, S., Gil-Garcia, J.R., Mellouli, S., Nahon, K., Pardo, T.A., & Scholl, H.J. (2012). Understanding smart cities: An integrative framework. In 45th Hawaii international conference on system sciences (pp. 2289-2297). Maui: IEEE. doi: 10.1109/HICSS.2012.615.
[4] Dunayev, I., Gavkalova, N., & Kud, A. (2023). Designing a platform-based model of civic participation within the smart-city concept for post-war Ukrainian cities. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 4(13(124)), 46-56. doi: 10.15587/1729-4061.2023.285448.
[5] Dziundziuk, K.V. (2023). Experience of implementing the concept of a Smart City in developing countries. Problems of Modern Transformations. Series: Law, Public Management and Administration, 7. doi: 10.54929/2786-5746-2023-7-02-01.
[6] European Union. (2020). New Leipzig charter: The transformative power of cities for the common good. Brussels: European Commission.
[7] Frolova, E.I. (2023). Methods of public administration: Essence and features. Juris Europensis Scientia, 1, 114-117. doi: 10.32782/chern.v1.2023.22.
[8] Hrytsak, L.B., & Durman, M.O. (2022). Local self-government in the system of public administration. Public Administration and National Security, 4. doi: 10.25313/2617-572X-2022-4-8099.
[9] Karpinskyi, B.A., Karpinska, O.B., & Pfister, D.H. (2022). Fundamentals of smart urbanism based on state-building patriotism: A strategic management approach. Scientific Perspectives, 7(25), 232-252. doi: 10.52058/2708-7530-2022-7(25)-232-252.
[10] Komarnytska, H. (2025). Smart City in the system of open data and e-government. Aspects of Public Administration, 13(3), 92-99. doi: 10.15421/152535.
[11] Kuzior, A., Pakhnenko, O., Tiutiunyk, I., & Lieonov, S.V. (2023). E-governance in Smart Cities: Global trends and key enablers. Smart Cities, 6(4), 1663-1689. doi: 10.3390/smartcities6040078.
[12] Mamatova, T., & Kravtsov, O. (2021). Ensuring the quality of public services under digital transformation. In Development vectors in public management and administration (pp. 208-228). Riga: Baltija Publishing. doi: 10.30525/978-9934-26-082-7-10.
[13] Morhunov, O.A. (2021). Administrative and legal methods of public administration in the field of physical culture and sports. Private and Public Law, 4, 72-76. doi: 10.32845/2663-5666.2021.4.12.
[14] Murayev, Y.V. (2020). Ukrainian experience in implementing the smart city concept: Achievements and challenges. Bulletin of Khmelnytskyi National University, 2, 91-96.
[15] Nemirovska, O.V. (2025). Management approach to Smart City as a social space of sustainable development. Transformations Journal, 4(9), 12-17. doi: 10.32782/2786-8141/2024-9-2.
[16] OECD. (2015). OECD principles on water governance. Paris: OECD Publishing.
[17] OECD. (2019). The path to becoming a data-driven public sector. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi: 10.1787/059814a7-en.
[18] Przeybilovicz, E., & Cunha, M.A. (2024). Governing in the digital age: The emergence of dynamic smart urban governance modes. Government Information Quarterly, 41(1), article number 101907. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2023.101907.
[19] Serhiichuk, L. (2025). Artificial intelligence in the Ukrainian public administration system: Legal development and implementation risks. Bratislava Law Review, 9(2), 243-260. doi: 10.46282/blr.2025.9.2.1062.
[20] Shulzhik, Y.O., Kvasnii, Z.V., & Oslikovskyy, V.V. (2025). Development of “Smart communities”: Implementation of Smart City solutions at the local level. The Actual Problems of Regional Economy Development, 2(21), 180-189. doi: 10.15330/apred.2.21.180-189.
[21] United Nations Human Settlements Programme. (2024). World cities report 2024: Cities and climate action. Nairobi: UN-HABITAT. doi: 10.18356/9789211065602.
[22] United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. Retrieved from https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda.
[23] Vdovychenko, O.M. (2022). Application of public administration methods in current conditions: Theoretical and practical aspects. Pivdennoukrainskyi Pravnychyi Chasopys, 3, 124-132. doi: 10.32850/sulj.2022.3.20.
[24] Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
[25] World Bank Group. (n.d.). Smart cities for sustainable development. Retrieved from https://academy.worldbank.org/en/infrastructure/urban-resilience/Smart-cities-for-sustainable-development.