Krasivskyy, O.
(2024).
Development and evolution of European Union policy.
Democratic Governance,
17(2),
46-57.
https://doi.org/10.56318/dg/2.2024.46
The European Union (EU) is a key player in global politics and economics, with its strategic decisions impacting international processes. The EU plays an active role in promoting stability, security, and economic development both within its member states and globally. The purpose of this study was to examine the key stages in the evolution of EU policy, tracing its development from inception to the present day, and identifying the main factors that have influenced these changes. The research methodology included historical analysis, comparative evaluation of international agreements, and a review of EU regulatory documents. These approaches provided insights into how EU policy has evolved over time. The findings indicated that the EU has undergone several transformative stages. Initially focused primarily on economic cooperation within the framework of the European Economic Community (EEC), the Union gradually moved towards deeper integration in political, social, and security spheres. In the early years, the emphasis was on fostering economic integration and creating a single market, which played a decisive role in stimulating trade and economic growth among member states. The 1990s marked a turning point: the signing of the Maastricht Treaty officially established the EU and introduced the euro as a common currency. Following this critical moment, EU policy began to shift towards strengthening common external and security strategies and expanding its geopolitical influence through enlargement initiatives that brought in new members. The study highlights that both internal and external challenges have greatly influenced the development of EU policy. These include financial crises, migration issues, and the far-reaching consequences of Brexit. These factors have prompted the EU to adapt to new circumstances and undertake reforms, impacting its political, economic, and security strategies. This study may serve as a foundation for forecasting future changes in EU policy as the Union continues to adapt to new global challenges. It may be of value to policymakers, researchers, and institutions interested in understanding the ongoing transformation of the EU political landscape
European integration, European Parliament, European Community, economic relations, political transformation
Received 02.08.2024, Revised 28.10.2024, Accepted 11.12.2024
Retrieved from Volume 17, No. 2, 2024
https://doi.org/10.56318/dg/2.2024.46
Pages 46-57
[1] Balland, P.A., Boschma, R., Crespo, J., & Rigby, D.L. (2018). Smart specialization policy in the European Union: Relatedness, knowledge complexity and regional diversification. Regional Studies, 53(9), 1252-1268. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2018.1437900.
[2] Baltazar, I. (2021). The European Union is at a crossroads: An Europe of different speeds? A study of the history of European unity. Debater a Europa, 25, 13-38. doi: 10.14195/1647-6336_25_1.
[3] Berchev, D. (2024). The past and the future of European union strategic culture and thinking in the field of security and defense. Security and Defense, 1, 25-49.
[4] Busemeyer, M.R., de la Porte, C., Garritzmann, J.L., & Pavolini, E. (Eds.). (2019). The future of the social investment state: Politics, policies and outcomes (1st ed.). London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780429454752.
[5] Chovet, M. (2023). “Europe of the regions”: From slogan to effects on European Union borders and regions. Borders in Globalization Review, 4, 61-70. doi: 10.18357/bigr42202321053.
[6] Ciappi, E. (2023). A reappraisal of the origins of European integration: From wartime planning to the Schuman plan. Journal of Contemporary History, 58(4), 676-696. doi: 10.1177/00220094231200453.
[7] Dir, I. (2024). Main treaties of the European Union. Uzhhorod National University Herald. Series: Law, 3, 263-268. doi: 10.24144/2307-3322.2024.81.3.39.
[8] Gowland, D. (2022). Britain and the European Union (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9781351018340.
[9] Griffiths, R. (2013). The European integration experience, 1945-1958. In: “Thank You M. Monnet”: Essays on the history of European integration (pp. 11-40). Amsterdam: University Press. doi: 10.1017/9789400601079.002.
[10] Jarrín, M., & Riordan, S. (2023). European Union-Latin America and the Caribbean inter-regionalism history. In Science diplomacy, cyberdiplomacy and techplomacy in EU-LAC relations (pp. 11-30). Cham: Springer. doi: 10.1007/9783-031-36868-4_2.
[11] Kim, Y.-J., & Kim, S. (2023). Crises of war and European integration: Background of the European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC). Korean Society for European Integration, 14, 89-116. doi: 10.32625/KJEI.2023.31.89.
[12] Lanzetta, V., & Ponsiglione, C. (2024). Why do we need to complement the European Union Regional Innovation Scoreboard with a cluster-neural network tool for what-if policy analysis? ArXiv. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2409.13316.
[13] Lawton, D. (2024). Lawyers against European Union: The Maastricht judicial review 1992-1993. Journal of Modern European History, 22, 392-410. doi: 10.1177/16118944241265580.
[14] Liargovas, P., & Christos, P. (2024). From Schuman Declaration to the establishment of the European Communities (1950-1958). In P. Liargovas & P. Christos (Eds.), The European integration (Vol. 1, pp. 51-70). Berlin: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-47776-8_4.
[15] Meunier, S., & Mcnamara, K. (2023). The state of the European Union: Making history: European integration and institutional change at fifty. Oxford: Oxford Academic. doi: 10.1093/oso/9780199218677.001.0001.
[16] Parol, A. (2024). The evolution of the principle of shared responsibility in the area of European integrated border management. Politeja, 21, 253-268. doi: 10.12797/Politeja.20.2024.88.1.15.
[17] Pfister, R. (2024). Pentecostals, European Union and nationalism. In S. Frestadius & M.J. Cartledge (Eds.), Pentecostal public theology (pp.219-244). London: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-61301-2_12.
[18] Popescu, M., Dobre, F., Ganea, O., & Vatase, F. (2024). Challenges of cohesion policy at the level of the European Union – simplification tools. Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, 18(1), 926-934. doi: 10.2478/picbe-2024-0080.
[19] Sánchez, P., Hernandez, M., & Muñoz, J. (2021). History of the European communities. Contemporary Perspectives, 27(2).
[20] Sándor, L. (2024). The different angles of the European democracy: Chances and challenges of achieving democratic legitimacy in Europe. Európai Tükör, 16(3), 7-22. doi: 10.32559/et.2023.3.2.
[21] Segers, M. (2023). The origins of European integration: The pre-history of today’s European Union, 1937-1951. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/9781009379380.
[22] Šuplata, M. (2023). Past accession experience and actual challenges for the European Union enlargement process. In Cooperation and enlargement: Two challenges to be addressed in the European projects-2022 studies in systems, decision and control (pp. 7-27). Wien: Springer Nature Switzerland. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-42253-9_2.
[23] The Amsterdam Treaty. (1997). Retrieved from http://surl.li/xtnqzj.
[24] The Treaty of Lisbon. (2007). Retrieved from https://eurlex.europa.eu/legalcontent/EN/LSU/?uri=CELEX:12007L/TXT. [25] Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community (Euratom). (1957). Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/EN/legal-content/summary/treaty-establishing-the-european-atomic-energy-community-euratom.html.
[25] Treaty establishing the European Coal and Steel Community. (1951, April). Retrieved from https://www.cvce.eu/obj/treaty_establishing_the_european_coal_and_steel_community_paris_18_april_1951-en-11a21305-941e-49d7-a171ed5be548cd58.html.
[26] Treaty of Nice. (2001). Retrieved from https://www.europarl.europa.eu/about-parliament/en/in-the-past/theparliament-and-the-treaties/treaty-of-nice.
[27] Treaty of Rome (EEC). (1957). Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/EN/legal-content/summary/treaty-ofrome-eec.html.
[28] Valli Buttow, C., & Weerts, S. (2022). Public sector information in the European Union policy: The misbalance between economy and individuals. Big Data & Society, 9(2). doi: 10.1177/20539517221124587.
[29] Zeitlin, J., Nicoli, F., & Laffan, B. (2019). Introduction: The European Union beyond the polycrisis? Integration and politicization in an age of shifting cleavages. Journal of European Public Policy, 26(7), 963-976. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2019.1619803.
[30] Zilioli, C. (2022). Foreword: Evolution, not revolution: The development of the role of the European Central Bank since its establishment. In T. Beukers, D. Fromage & G. Monti (Eds), The new European Central Bank: Taking stock and looking ahead. Oxford: Oxford Academic. doi: 10.1093/oso/9780198871231.002.0005.