Savchenko, O.
(2022).
Innovative aspects of development of digitalization of public governance in the USA.
Democratic Governance,
15(2),
120-130.
https://doi.org/10.23939/dg2022.02.120
The basic principles and tools of digitalization of public administration in the United States are analyzed. Attention is drawn to the system of e-government and open governance, and the system of electronic services in the United States is analyzed. The active participation of the US government in the implementation of programs for the digitalization of public administration and the formation of an open society is noted. Ways to implement the US experience in Ukraine are suggested
public administration, digitalization, electronic services, electronic governance, open government, provision of online services
Received 02.08.2022, Revised 04.11.2022, Accepted 21.11.2022
Retrieved from Volume 15, No. 2, 2022
https://doi.org/10.23939/dg2022.02.120
Pages 120-130
[1] Barkin, A., Drozhzhinov, V., & Travkin, Yu. (2003). The USA introduces electronic government within the framework of the law. Retrieved from http://www.pcweek.ru/themes/detail.php?ID=64729.
[2] Voropai, E. (2012). Data.gov – American electronic government Greenhouse of social technologies. Retrieved from http://te-st.ru/apps/datagov/.
[3] E-Projects in the world: E-US Government. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.e-gorod.ru/eproject/proj6.htm.
[4] Kononenko, D.V. (2013). Modernization of electronic government concepts: Comparative legal analysis. Bulletin of Volgograd State University. Series 5: Jurisprudence, 2(19), 34-38.
[5] Minervin, I.G. (2015). Evolution of electronic government in the USA. Economic and Social Problems of Russia, 2, 48-75.
[6] Khramtsovskaya, N.A. (2012). Open government of the USA: Main ideas and implementation practice. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://d-russia.ru/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Open-government_original.pdf.
[7] Lenihan, D.G. (2008). Realigning governance: From e-Government to e-Democracy. In A. Anttiroiko (Ed.), Electronic government: Concepts, methodologies, tools, and applications (pp. 3389-3422). Pennsylvania: IGI Global. doi: 10.4018/978-1-59904-947-2.ch250.
[8] E-Government Act of 2002. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EGovernment_Act_of_2002.
[9] United Nations. (2014). E-Government for the future we want. E-Government surveis. Retrieved from https://www.ipa.government.bg/en/e-government-future-we-want
[10] Erway, R., Hill, C., Streams, S., & Harmon, S. (2015). The National Digital Platform for libraries, archives and museums. Washington: Martin Luther King Jr. Memorial Library.
[11] Lindquist, E., & Huse, I. (2017). Accountability and monitoring government in the digital era: Promise, realism and research for digital era governance. Canadian Public Administration, 60(4), 627-656.
[12] Maguire, S. (2011). Can data deliver better government? The Political Quarterly, 82(4), 522-525.
[13] Erway, R., Hill, C., Streams, S., & Harmon, S. (2015). The National Digital Platform for libraries, archives and museums. Washington: Martin Luther King Jr. Memorial Library.
[14] Sun, T.Q., & Medaglia, R. (2019). Mapping the challenges of Artificial Intelligence in the public sector: Evidence from public healthcare. Government Information Quarterly,36(2), 368-383.