The features of modernization of communication activities of public administration bodies in modern conditions are considered. The factors of communication activities of public administration bodies in Ukraine are analyzed. The foreign experience of using information technologies by local self-government bodies, which can be applied in Ukrainian realities, is considered. The directions of improvement of interaction between public authorities and the public are substantiated
communicative activity, public agencies, modernization, state, technologies
Received 16.01.2022, Revised 05.04.2022, Accepted 29.04.2022
Retrieved from Volume 15, No. 1, 2022
https://doi.org/10.23939/dg2022.01.071
Pages 71-82
[1] Bacevich, F.S. (2004). Basics of communicative linguistics. Kyiv: Academy.
[2] Halytska, M.M. (2014). Intercultural communication and its importance for the professional activity of future specialists. Educational Discourse, 2(6), 23-32.
[3] Hrytsiak, N.V., & Litvynova, L.V. (2015). State management in the conditions of the development of the information society. Kyiv: K.I.S.
[4] Degtiareva, I.O. (2013). Internet sites as effective tools for ensuring regional development. In Days of information society – 2013: Materials of every year science and practice conference for international student (p.100). Kyiv: NADU.
[5] Dreshpak, V. (2015). The structure of the websites of the county cities of Poland (on the example of the cities of the Pomeranian Voivodeship). In Latest information and communication technologies in the modernization of public administration: Foreign and domestic experience: Materials of III science and practice seminar (pp. 22-28). Dnipro: DRIDU NADU.
[6] Ignatenko, O.V. (n.d.). Formation of intercultural communicative competence in the process of teaching business English. Retrieved from http://confesp.fl.kpi.ua/node/1142.
[7] Kushniriuk, V.M. (2013). Communicative etiquette of a civil servant. Kyiv: LLC “SIK GROUP UKRAIN”.
[8] Maltseva, K.S. (2002). Intercultural misunderstandings and the problem of intercultural translation. (Doctoral dissertation, Institute of Philosophy named after H.S. Skovoroda of the NASU, Kyiv, Ukraine).
[9] Manakin, V.M. (2012). Language and intercultural communication. Kyiv: TsUL.
[10] Makarenko, E.A., Ryzhkov, M.M., Kuchmiy, O.P., & Frolova, O.M. (2014). International information: Terms and comments. Kyiv: Center Village Press.
[11] Miazova, I.Yu. (2008). Intercultural communication: content, essence and peculiarities of manifestation (social and philosophical analysis). (Doctoral dissertation, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine).
[12] Ter-Mynasova, S.G. (2000). Language and intercultural communication. Moscow: Slovo.
[13] Mamatova, T., Sharov, Yu., & Zvarych, M. (2013). Public participation in monitoring the provision of services by public authorities: Normative regulation. Kyiv: [B. v.].